≡ Menu

Smith Manoeuvre Portfolio Update – June 2010

For those of you just joining us, below is my portfolio that is leveraged with money borrowed from my home equity line of credit (HELOC). As the money borrowed is used to invest, the interest charged is tax deductible. I write an update every so often to show new positions added along with any market gains/losses. For more details on the strategy and procedure, check out my modified smith manoeuvre strategy and my comparison of online stock brokers.

Since I started this portfolio in 2008, it has been a wild roller coaster ride.  I had great market timing in 2008 and leveraged the portfolio a few months before everything fell apart (note the sarcasm).  Even though the portfolio value fell over 25%, I stuck with the plan and the dividends never stopped rolling in.  Now in 2010, the portfolio is hovering around break even, with the dividend stream still going strong.

Since March of 2009, the markets have been red hot.  So hot in fact that I’ve been having trouble finding strong dividend companies with attractive valuations.  In other words, I have been doing very little buying.  I have, however, during this most recent correction initiated two new positions for the portfolio. They are Ensign Energy Services (ESI.TO) and Mullen Group (MTL.TO).

ESI is a oil well drilling contractor that has increased their dividend over the past 4 years, has a strong balance sheet with no long term debt and has a payout ratio of approximately 57%.  Mullen Group is mostly known for the oil field services and trucking business in western Canada.  Although their balance sheet isn’t as clean as ESI’s, they have a ton of cash, trade below book value and have a 3.6% dividend yield with a low 38% payout ratio.

My dividend watch list hasn’t changed since my last couple reports.  I am looking to increase my position in T.BMO, T.TD, T.ENB, T.FCR and new positions in T.CNR and T.L when their valuations become attractive.

The Portfolio as of June 2010:

Stock Symbol Shares Avg Buy Price Total Div/Share Yield
Royal Bank RY.T 75 $47.62 $3,571.25 $2 4.20%
CIBC CM.T 45 $67.14 $3,021.25 $3.48 5.18%
Power Financial PWF.T 105 $35.14 $3,689.65 $1.40 3.98%
Scotia Bank BNS.T 105 $41.91 $4,400.52 $1.96 4.68%
Manulife Financial MFC.T 125 $33.12 $4,139.48 $0.52 1.57%
Fortis Properties FTS.T 150 $25.63 $3,843.98 $1.04 4.06%
TransCanada Corp TRP.T 100 $33.50 $3,349.74 $1.52 4.52%
AGF Management Limited AGF.B.T 50 $22.71 $1,135.49 $1.00 4.40%
Bank of Montreal BMO.T 25 $44.17 $1,104.24 $2.80 6.34%
Husky Energy HSE.T 135 $32.53 $4,391.27 $1.20 3.69%
TD Bank TD.T 50 $48.24 $2,412.23 $2.44 5.06%
Enbridge ENB.T 40 $37.36 $1494.39 $1.48 3.96%
TransAlta TA.T 50 $21.47 $1073.49 $1.16 5.40%
First Capital Realty FCR.T 100 $15.75 $1,574.99 $1.28 8.13%
Canadian Utilities CU.T 50 $36.40 $1,819.99 $1.41 3.87%
Ensign Energy Services ESI.T 100 $13.81 $1,380.99 $0.35 2.55%
Mullen Group MTL.T 50 $14.18 $708.99 $0.50 3.58%

More Stats

  • Total Cost Base of Equities (inc. fees): $43,111.94
  • Market Value of Equities (June 15, 2010): $44,223.65
  • Total Dividends / Year: $1,834.10
  • Portfolio Dividend Yield: 4.25%

Sector Allocation (based on market value)

  • Financials:    54.25%
  • Utilities:    16.97%
  • Energy:    25.53%
  • Resources:    0.00%
  • Real Estate:    3.24%
  • Other:     0.00%

With regards to sector allocation, you may notice that this portfolio is fairly concentrated in financials.  Note though that this is one of my accounts where I treat all of my accounts as one big portfolio.  In other words, my international and other sector equity exposure are in other accounts.

Disclaimer: There have been a lot of readers who have mentioned that they are interested in a leveraged portfolio.  Over the long term it may be lucrative.  However, over the short term, equities are volatile and can put the portfolio deep in the red.  My portfolio over 2008 is a prime example of what can happen.  If you can’t stomach losing 20-30% in the portfolio in any given year, then your risk tolerance isn’t suited for leveraged investing.  As well, the securities mentioned in this post are not recommendations to buy or sell.

If you would like to read more articles like this, you can sign up for my free newsletter service below (we will not spam you).

FT About the author: FT is the founder and editor of Million Dollar Journey (est. 2006). Through various financial strategies outlined on this site, he grew his net worth from $200,000 in 2006 to $1,000,000 by 2014. You can read more about him here.

{ 22 comments… add one }
  • Rin June 16, 2010, 12:32 pm

    Carfinco CFN.UN is giving a regular cash distribution of 2 cents per trust unit and a special cash distribution of 10 cents per trust unit have been declared for June 2010, with a payable date of June 30, 2010

  • Doctor Stock June 16, 2010, 1:49 pm

    Thanks… some great holdings. As investors look for dividend paying stocks, I trust they’ll find them in companies that have solid fundamentals. There’s no point earning 5% dividend and losing 15% in stock value.

  • Big Cajun Man June 16, 2010, 4:15 pm

    Why didn’t you use ETF’s or Index Funds to cover a wider investment window?

    You are a bold person for trying this, and even wilder for publishing where you stand!

  • FT FrugalTrader June 16, 2010, 8:23 pm

    @ BCM – I’ve thought about that, but the dividend ETFs that I looked at all had ROC included in the distributions, and I don’t have control over what dividend stocks I own. In a sense, I have created my own little ETF. But you are right about publishing this stuff publicly, it can get embarrassing when the markets are in bear mode.

  • Financial Cents June 16, 2010, 9:40 pm

    Hey Frugal – that portfolio is looking better and better all the time! Well done and great reminders/disclaimers to all about leveraged investing. Like mountain climbing, it’s not for everyone :)

  • Aury (Thunderdrake) June 16, 2010, 9:55 pm

    Whew! That’s one rock solid portfolio you got there!

    TD and Scotiabank seem like particularly nice shares… And I’ve had a lot of interest in TD as of late. I might consider banking on TD in particular as part of my financial sector, once I get there….

  • ScottTO June 16, 2010, 10:26 pm

    Looking good as usual. But had to mention that you might need to check the dividend payouts. FCR for instence has dropped the dividend to 0.80 cents per share per year.

    But there was/is a stock split 3:2 I believe. I know cause I own this stock. But still a good one.

    • FT FrugalTrader June 17, 2010, 9:21 am

      @ Atlas, I was planning on holding the equities forever and keep collecting the dividends. The interest exposure is hedged a little against higher rates as I get a tax deduction. So I get approx 35% discount from the current prime rate (2.5% * (1-35%) = 1.63%). If prime rate goes up to 10% (real rate: 6.5%) , I would probably continue to capitalize the interest as it’s not paid out of pocket.

      @ScottTO, I didn’t know that about FCR, thanks for the heads up!

  • Atlas Financial Planning June 16, 2010, 11:59 pm

    I would never recommend using leverage to a client, but if you are going to do it, you are going about it the right way, keeping fees low by avoiding high fee mutual funds is a must, a good dividend yeild to offset interest costs is a nice bonus as well.
    Do you have an exit stratagy in mind? Interest rates are at all time lows right now, but they have started going up and that is going to eat into your profits, or increase or losses. How high a rate are you willing to pay?

  • Andrew F June 17, 2010, 10:41 am

    I thought I posted this earlier:

    Anyway, it would be interesting to see what your after tax interest cost has been versus your after tax dividend income. That extra income is additional return over the current value of your portfolio.

  • GTK June 17, 2010, 11:44 am

    Am I right in understanding that even if rates go up to the point where your dividends do not cover your “discounted” LOC interested payments (due to tax refund), you are still converting your mortgage debt into tax deductible debt — and that the effective interest you are paying will still be much cheaper than any mortgage available at that time.

    Assuming the portfolio above with a 4.25% dividend, 20% tax on these dividends(accurate?), LOC interest of prime @ 10%, tax refund of approx 35% on interest:

    You effectively pay 10% – 3.5% (tax refund) – 4.25% (dividends) + .85% (dividend taxes of 4.25*0.2) ~ 3.1%.

    Ideally, for the Smith Maneuver, the dividend payments + tax refund more than cover the interest on the LOC allowing you to prepay your mortgage even faster . However, even if this isn’t the case, you are still ahead — it would be impossible to find a 3.1% mortgage in a 10% Prime environment.

    Or am I completely missing something here? I guess the exit strategy would change once the mortgage is completely paid off. In that kind of environment I suppose you would then focus on paying off the LOC debt ASAP.

  • wx_junkie June 17, 2010, 11:46 am

    FT, nice to see your updates. I like to compare with my SM results. My portfolio yield currently sits at 4.00%, but I have invested in a few non-dividend payers such as Paladin, Sandvine and Timminco (and will probably be adding a position of RIM at the end of this month, so it’ll drop to below 4…) but anyway. I started in May of last year, so needless to say I’m sitting pretty (yes, this is luck, not skill).

    Up until now I have planned on keeping the stocks forever, but now I am more leaning to sell the entire lot after my mortgage is paid (projected in 11 years), and pay off the entire HELOC balance, including taxes on capital gains. THAT IS, provided we are not in another recession at that time. We’ll see anyway. I love the SM, it’s been a fun endeavor, and in encourage anyone with a long investment horizon to consider it.

  • GTK June 17, 2010, 11:52 am

    On second thought, I think I was completely missing something, since in the above scenario you are not making any mortgage pre-payments — which is the whole point of the Smith Maneuver.

  • Qz June 18, 2010, 12:54 pm

    Thanks for providing this insight. Do you have any thoughts on holding some of the portfolio as preferred shares? They seem to offer decent dividend yields and much lower volatility.

  • FT FrugalTrader June 18, 2010, 3:34 pm

    @wx_junkie, congrats on the timing! I wish I started the SM in April/May 2009!

    @Qz, I have thought about preferreds, but they provide very little growth opportunities in both capital and dividends. As well, the preferred shares availalbe in Canada will most likely be the underlying issues of the common stock that I already hold (lacks diversfication).

  • Andrew F June 18, 2010, 4:27 pm

    From my understanding, as well, preferreds add a wrinkle to interest deductibility. You can only deduct interest at rates up to the coupon rate on the preferred. This should be confirmed, but I did hear this somewhere, and it does make some sense.

  • Ed Rempel June 18, 2010, 9:42 pm

    Hi Andrew,

    CRA specifically states in IT-533 that there is no requirement for investment income to be sufficient to cover the interest. Here is a direct quote:

    “Courts should not be concerned with the sufficiency of the income expected or received.”

    In our case, we have been doing versions of the SM for 15 years and have not yet received even a penny of dividends. (Our focus is on long term growth and trying to avoid paying any tax on investment income.)

    Having received zero dividends so far has no effect on interest deductibility.

    Ed

  • Dividend Growth Investor June 21, 2010, 12:40 pm

    I am sure you are aware of it, but isn’t a 50% allocation to financials a little excessive? I now that Canada doesn’t have consumer staples companies such as CLX, JNJ, PG, MCD etc, and probably retailers suc has Metro don’t yield much to cover your interest expense; But it seems that your risk is double here – first leverage and second concentration in financials.

    Best Regards and Good Luck!

    Dividend Growth Investor

  • Felix June 26, 2010, 3:04 am

    great article… but I need to point out that using my RBC homeline LOC to purchase a rental property has hammered my credit score. Although my credit accounts are all rated R1, the RBC reports my full LOC balance to the credit bureau, so it appears to the bureau and to lenders that I have a huge maxed out consumer LOC, which has dropped my FICO from 750+ to the 630 range. This makes obtaining a vehicle lease or other financing outside my RBC Homeline virtually impossible. For example, although I have lots of equity in my home, I am unable to obtain 0% financing on a new vehicle as the large RBC LOC balance used for investments makes lenders very nervous.
    I just want to mention this. I would recommend that investors research lenders who do not report the LOC portion to the bureau. I heard Merix does not report the LOC portion of the mortgage to the bureau so I may switch from RBC when my Homeline Plan is up for renewal.

  • Tommy June 30, 2010, 12:58 am

    Hi FrugalTrader, we have a few similar holdings. I have TransAlta, BMO, Manulife and Powerfinancial. Man, financial sector has been getting hit big time with the Euro debt concern and financial reform. I am a firm believer of Manulife as the business has been going strong. The cut in dividend has reflected in the market price, although I am very surprised that the share price keeps going down (to $15.50-ish now). My avg cost of Manulife is $20-ish. *ouch* I am looking forward to adding “AGF”.. and Enbridge or Fortis (and some telecommunications). My primary focus during this turbulent time is on traditional, non-sexy, industries like telecommunication and utilities. These two sectors will continue to survive in case the so-called double-dip recession occurs. I hope it does.. so I can buy more and average down. I am also following ‘Crescent Point Energy” and Claymore’s CDZ and iShare XTR/XRE (income funds ETF). These ones will provide a great diversification in my portfolio.

    PS: I can feel your pain for Manulife… it shouldn’t be this low price!!!

    **By the way, one great way to see which company has been INCREASING dividends for the last 5 years is check out Claymore’s CDZ ETF. Just go to the website and see the top holdings. Most financials are on the list except Manulife (for obvious reason). I am surprised to find CML Healthcare on there.. I got some holdings since Canada doesn’t really have a big healthcare industry. The largest retail drug store, Shoppers Drug Mart, is taking a dive. You just know the investors are waiting to see how their revenues will be impacted by the Ontario gov’t’s new rule on generic drugs. Anyway.. keep investing! Opportunities are FINALLY knocking on the door again…

  • Amit October 31, 2010, 7:07 am

    Hello FT, it will be really interesting to view your entire giant portfolio that includes the equities in your other accounts (TFSA/RRSP) so that we can get a good idea about how to base our own giant portfolio.

    For example, I have 5 accounts – 2 RRSPs (one for me and my wife), and 2 spousal RRSP accounts for both of us, 1 non-registered account, and 2 TFSA accounts; and I also treat all my assets as 1 giant portfolio. Looking at just 1 account may give someone a false idea about my holdings, but looking all accounts together the asset allocation makes sense.

    I have divided all the accounts in this way:- 15% Canadian Stocks and Bonds, 15% Developed Stocks and Bonds, 15% Emerging, and 55% US.
    I have 80/20 split between stocks and bonds in all 4 sections (Canada, US, Developed, and Emerging) and have further divided my equities into Large Cap, Large Cap Value, Mid Cap, Mid Cap value, Small Cap, Small Cap value, and REITs keeping the following breakdown for the 80% – 34% Large Cap + Large Cap Value, 34% Mid Cap, Mid Cap Value, Small Cap, Small Cap Value, 12% REIT.

    I have bought ETFs for most of my developed and emerging holdings – like EWG, DLS, EFV, BRF, GULF, DEM, DWX, VWO.

    I have bought individual dividend paying stocks for my US side of the portfolio spread amongst the various accounts like:- BMS, ED, VFC, NLY, ABT, STON, etc.

    For Canadian side (entire non-registered section of my one big portfolio) I am split between deciding to keep ETFs like CDZ, XCV, XDV, XIU in my portfolio or to keep individual Canadian dividend paying stocks. For now, it’s the ETFs but could switch to using individual stocks in the future.

    Looking forward to a post about your entire one big portfolio.

    Thanks.

  • FT FrugalTrader October 31, 2010, 10:58 am

    Hey Amit! I wouldn’t use myself as a model for proper asset allocation. :) However, I do model my portfolio for optimal tax efficiency, you can read more about it here: https://www.milliondollarjourney.com/portfolio-allocation-rrsps-tfsas-and-taxable-accounts.htm

Leave a Comment