<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: March 2008 Net Worth Update: (+1.17%)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm</link>
	<description>Building Wealth through Saving and Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:56:43 -0330</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Links: Lending Club Interview</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-30275</link>
		<dc:creator>Links: Lending Club Interview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-30275</guid>
		<description>[...] Dollar Journey also gives us his net worth. I&#8217;d take a 1.17% gain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] Dollar Journey also gives us his net worth. I&#8217;d take a 1.17% gain [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-30189</link>
		<dc:creator>JR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-30189</guid>
		<description>First impression on your net worth mix is that it is messy and that your investment property unless it is producing positive cash flow should be dumped.

In my experience investment properties should be highly leveraged 100% if possible and should always produce positive cash flow at 90% occupancy.

Next the RRSP, what kind of return/risk is this giving you?
RRSP&#039;s are a great tool when used properly for cash flow and investing when used properly, and IMO should be melted down every year. Assuming you dont have the cash to do this, but have an HELOC to draw on, one example assuming you can max, is to put half of your available RRSP entitlement in on December 29, then withdraw whatever you put, is to put in $5k increments on January 2nd, then either put that back onto the RRSP again, or wait for the tax return then put it into SFTS such as what Mineral fields offers

I agree that you need a certain amount of cash on hand, generally 2-months at the level of your living expenses, no-more

Non-registered investments should include a minimum, non speculative guaranteed return that after capital gains and any interest carrying charge would net you upper of 20%

On the SM, doing the T-SWP, well, thereare several other options, since MutFunds are not always flat and have high management fees. There are other choices, either inside or outside of the RRSP. One example if you are using an HELOC is to do pick of the many good stable income trusts, and there are many that would yield 13-15%. 

A twist to this is doing it on the big boards (US market) and keep buying the stock (units) for averaging, then to sell an option (CC) deep in the money (ditm) as far out in the calendar that you can go  to minimize the risk and maximize the return by reinvesting the call money received. 

This way you will own the stock and get monthly distributions that you can use to pay down the mortgage (SM-rule) or reinvest, or take the cash out to put into a RRSP combo with SFTS.

For those that feel comfortable with RRSP and want to do a combo SM &amp; HELOC, why not, once the RRSP is built up far enough, simply hold the mortgage on the house within the RRSP and pay yourself. But as I said before, Iam not a holder of RRSPs, I just like to use the advantage of the loophole and leverage to get the tax back and to use the money during the 12-months along with the tax return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First impression on your net worth mix is that it is messy and that your investment property unless it is producing positive cash flow should be dumped.</p>
<p>In my experience investment properties should be highly leveraged 100% if possible and should always produce positive cash flow at 90% occupancy.</p>
<p>Next the RRSP, what kind of return/risk is this giving you?<br />
RRSP&#8217;s are a great tool when used properly for cash flow and investing when used properly, and IMO should be melted down every year. Assuming you dont have the cash to do this, but have an HELOC to draw on, one example assuming you can max, is to put half of your available RRSP entitlement in on December 29, then withdraw whatever you put, is to put in $5k increments on January 2nd, then either put that back onto the RRSP again, or wait for the tax return then put it into SFTS such as what Mineral fields offers</p>
<p>I agree that you need a certain amount of cash on hand, generally 2-months at the level of your living expenses, no-more</p>
<p>Non-registered investments should include a minimum, non speculative guaranteed return that after capital gains and any interest carrying charge would net you upper of 20%</p>
<p>On the SM, doing the T-SWP, well, thereare several other options, since MutFunds are not always flat and have high management fees. There are other choices, either inside or outside of the RRSP. One example if you are using an HELOC is to do pick of the many good stable income trusts, and there are many that would yield 13-15%. </p>
<p>A twist to this is doing it on the big boards (US market) and keep buying the stock (units) for averaging, then to sell an option (CC) deep in the money (ditm) as far out in the calendar that you can go  to minimize the risk and maximize the return by reinvesting the call money received. </p>
<p>This way you will own the stock and get monthly distributions that you can use to pay down the mortgage (SM-rule) or reinvest, or take the cash out to put into a RRSP combo with SFTS.</p>
<p>For those that feel comfortable with RRSP and want to do a combo SM &amp; HELOC, why not, once the RRSP is built up far enough, simply hold the mortgage on the house within the RRSP and pay yourself. But as I said before, Iam not a holder of RRSPs, I just like to use the advantage of the loophole and leverage to get the tax back and to use the money during the 12-months along with the tax return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: March 2008 Net Worth Update: 0.0%</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-30034</link>
		<dc:creator>March 2008 Net Worth Update: 0.0%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-30034</guid>
		<description>[...] Million Dollar Journey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] Million Dollar Journey [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAvid</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29804</link>
		<dc:creator>DAvid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29804</guid>
		<description>FT quoted: &quot;The arse has fallin out of her.&quot;

I believe &quot;The arse is gone right clean out of &#039;er&quot; is a similar quote, and the whole skit which uses the line can be found here [ http://www.buddywasisname.com/l_awful.htm ], and well describes the current market:



For those of you who are unfamiliar with Buddy Whasisname &amp; the Other Fellers, they are a renowned trio of Newfoundland entertainers who compile a wealth of original material based on the Newfoundland vernacular. This piece is well worth a read. 

DAvid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FT quoted: &#8220;The arse has fallin out of her.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe &#8220;The arse is gone right clean out of &#8216;er&#8221; is a similar quote, and the whole skit which uses the line can be found here [ <a href="http://www.buddywasisname.com/l_awful.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.buddywasisname.com/l_awful.htm</a> ], and well describes the current market:</p>
<p>For those of you who are unfamiliar with Buddy Whasisname &amp; the Other Fellers, they are a renowned trio of Newfoundland entertainers who compile a wealth of original material based on the Newfoundland vernacular. This piece is well worth a read. </p>
<p>DAvid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links 3-31-08 at Finer Things Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29758</link>
		<dc:creator>links 3-31-08 at Finer Things Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29758</guid>
		<description>[...] Tracking net worth Money Smart Life meticulously tracks his net worth. It is an intriguing concept, but I&#8217;m not sure if I have the patience or discipline for it. Tags: finances [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] Tracking net worth Money Smart Life meticulously tracks his net worth. It is an intriguing concept, but I&#8217;m not sure if I have the patience or discipline for it. Tags: finances [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29739</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29739</guid>
		<description>Geoff, I&#039;ve tried using MACD as a technical indicator but with very little luck.  I had some luck with MACD divergence analysis, but I find the best indicators are price/volume analysis (for traders).  

Otherwise, my income investments are for the long term, and I simply buy them when their yields are a bit higher than normal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, I&#8217;ve tried using MACD as a technical indicator but with very little luck.  I had some luck with MACD divergence analysis, but I find the best indicators are price/volume analysis (for traders).  </p>
<p>Otherwise, my income investments are for the long term, and I simply buy them when their yields are a bit higher than normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29738</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29738</guid>
		<description>Thanks FG,

Do you mean you consider the MACD for the stocks you&#039;re interested in?

Do you have a blog entry on any technical indicators you may use during your stock considerations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks FG,</p>
<p>Do you mean you consider the MACD for the stocks you&#8217;re interested in?</p>
<p>Do you have a blog entry on any technical indicators you may use during your stock considerations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29736</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29736</guid>
		<description>Hey DG, thanks for the tips.  My plan is to diversify through the sectors as you mentioned.  I basically have favorites in each sector that I watch and wait for them to be oversold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey DG, thanks for the tips.  My plan is to diversify through the sectors as you mentioned.  I basically have favorites in each sector that I watch and wait for them to be oversold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dividendgrowth</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29733</link>
		<dc:creator>Dividendgrowth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29733</guid>
		<description>MDJ,

If I were investing in dividend achievers or aristocrats I would not be concentrated too much in a single sector of the market. Traditionally we have had financials ,utilities, real estate trusts and some oil and gas trusts ( in US) that have paid the most dividends. 
You should also try to own at least 20-30 dividend stocks from a variety of sectors for diversification; you should also own a blend of high-yield stocks as well as high-dividend growth ones with average yields. You could see my watchlist here:(sorry to post an outside link)

http://dividendgrowth.blogspot.com/2008/03/dividend-growth-stocks-watchlist.html

Good luck with your investments and the with the baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MDJ,</p>
<p>If I were investing in dividend achievers or aristocrats I would not be concentrated too much in a single sector of the market. Traditionally we have had financials ,utilities, real estate trusts and some oil and gas trusts ( in US) that have paid the most dividends.<br />
You should also try to own at least 20-30 dividend stocks from a variety of sectors for diversification; you should also own a blend of high-yield stocks as well as high-dividend growth ones with average yields. You could see my watchlist here:(sorry to post an outside link)</p>
<p><a href="http://dividendgrowth.blogspot.com/2008/03/dividend-growth-stocks-watchlist.html" rel="nofollow">http://dividendgrowth.blogspot.com/2008/03/dividend-growth-stocks-watchlist.html</a></p>
<p>Good luck with your investments and the with the baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29732</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29732</guid>
		<description>Hey Geoff!  If I could tell where the bottom was for stocks, I would be a very very wealthy man. :)  

For me though, since i&#039;m primarily investing in &quot;income/dividend&quot; producing stocks, I wait for higher than normal yields from the strong dividend payers.  Ie. banks are a prime candidate these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Geoff!  If I could tell where the bottom was for stocks, I would be a very very wealthy man. :)  </p>
<p>For me though, since i&#8217;m primarily investing in &#8220;income/dividend&#8221; producing stocks, I wait for higher than normal yields from the strong dividend payers.  Ie. banks are a prime candidate these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm/comment-page-1#comment-29730</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/march-2008-net-worth-update-117.htm#comment-29730</guid>
		<description>Great update - thanks!

How do you determine where the bottom is for your stocks? Do you consider technical or fundamentals?

Are you considering agriculture or commodity stocks - or are you only considering predominantly mainstream S&amp;P/TSX index stocks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great update &#8211; thanks!</p>
<p>How do you determine where the bottom is for your stocks? Do you consider technical or fundamentals?</p>
<p>Are you considering agriculture or commodity stocks &#8211; or are you only considering predominantly mainstream S&amp;P/TSX index stocks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

