<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm</link>
	<description>Building Wealth through Saving and Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:38:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-111268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-111268</guid>
		<description>Hi Raj,

The 10 questions for &quot;Ed&#039;s Mortgage Referral Service&quot; are in the article above. We are still offering it. If you send us the answers to those questions, we will refer you to our contact at whichever bank that offers a Smith Manoeuvre mortgage will be the best choice in your situation.

It is fine to wait, since you are starting with zero. However, there are options to get going sooner. You can automatically invest the principal portion of every mortgage payment, or you can use that amount to pay the interest on a larger investment loan.



Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Raj,</p>
<p>The 10 questions for &#8220;Ed&#8217;s Mortgage Referral Service&#8221; are in the article above. We are still offering it. If you send us the answers to those questions, we will refer you to our contact at whichever bank that offers a Smith Manoeuvre mortgage will be the best choice in your situation.</p>
<p>It is fine to wait, since you are starting with zero. However, there are options to get going sooner. You can automatically invest the principal portion of every mortgage payment, or you can use that amount to pay the interest on a larger investment loan.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-111267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-111267</guid>
		<description>Hi Raj,

I don&#039;t understand any or your comments about the Firstline Matrix. Why would you want to pay more to Firstline when you can get a cheaper mortgage elsewhere? You can save a lot of money with other options.

Sorry to say this, but it sounds like a mortgage broker is trying to persuade you of something. The arguments you state are the classic arguments used by banks and mortgage brokers to such you into longer term fixed rates.

Firstline does not offer variable or 1-year rates - so you can only lock yourself into longer terms at higher rates. Studies consistently show that you can save money with variable or 1-year rates.

The last thing you should do is fall into the &quot;5-Year Fixed Mortgage Trap&quot;. Banks and mortgage brokers try to suck you into them, because they make way more money on them, but you will almost definitely pay more  - plus you lose all your flexibility and negotiating power for 5 years.

5-year fixed mortgage are a jail sentence!

Moshe Milevsky, prof. at York University showed that the average Canadian wastes $23,000 after tax in their life because they got sucked into 5-year fixed mortgages, rather than variable. In short, one entire working year for the average Canadian is wasted only because they got sucked into 5-year fixed mortgages.

I saw one study from a mortgage broker that compared five 1-year mortgages to one 5-year mortgage since 1950. It showed that 1-year mortgages saved money 100% of the time. In other words, probably every last Canadian that every took out a 5-year fixed mortgage wasted money on interest.

You mentioned $2,500/year savings as though it is nothing. Multiply by 25 years that you may have mortgages in your life and you get $62,500 savings over your life - after tax. Don&#039;t you want to save all this money?

You are right that rates are low today and will likely rise, but the 5-year rate is close to 2% above the 1-year rate. If rates rise by 2.5% and stay there, five 1-year mortgages still win over taking a 5-year today.

Today, we are recommending 1-year fixed, not variable. The best variable rates are prime -.3%, but we expect that the prime -.85% rates will be back in a year or 2, so why lock in for 5 years at a small discount?

We are recommending to stick with the 1-year fixed and are getting 1.99% today.

I don&#039;t mind worrying about the small chance of a huge rise in interest rates. I&#039;ll keep the 2%/year savings and nearly 100% chance of saving thousands of dollars. :)

The other important factor is that, whenever your mortgage comes due, you have all kinds of opportunities - you can refinance other debt, you can restructure for investment or other strategies, or you an negotiate other goodies from the bank.

During your term, you have zero negotiating power with the bank, plus the odds of you having to pay a penalty sometime during your term are high. You generally cannot sell your home or refinance without paying a penalty.


Until recently, mortgages from every institution did not show on the Credit Bureau. Most still don&#039;t but they are moving them all onto it.

This should not be a major factor, since you need to declare all your existing mortgages anyway when you apply for a new one. If you are applying for a mortgage and don&#039;t declare existing mortgages you have because they don&#039;t show on the Credit Bureau - that is fraud. You can get sued for that.

I would suggest to ignore the fear of higher rates you are being told to worry about and stick with saving money, Raj.

I hope you find this helpful.


Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Raj,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand any or your comments about the Firstline Matrix. Why would you want to pay more to Firstline when you can get a cheaper mortgage elsewhere? You can save a lot of money with other options.</p>
<p>Sorry to say this, but it sounds like a mortgage broker is trying to persuade you of something. The arguments you state are the classic arguments used by banks and mortgage brokers to such you into longer term fixed rates.</p>
<p>Firstline does not offer variable or 1-year rates &#8211; so you can only lock yourself into longer terms at higher rates. Studies consistently show that you can save money with variable or 1-year rates.</p>
<p>The last thing you should do is fall into the &#8220;5-Year Fixed Mortgage Trap&#8221;. Banks and mortgage brokers try to suck you into them, because they make way more money on them, but you will almost definitely pay more  &#8211; plus you lose all your flexibility and negotiating power for 5 years.</p>
<p>5-year fixed mortgage are a jail sentence!</p>
<p>Moshe Milevsky, prof. at York University showed that the average Canadian wastes $23,000 after tax in their life because they got sucked into 5-year fixed mortgages, rather than variable. In short, one entire working year for the average Canadian is wasted only because they got sucked into 5-year fixed mortgages.</p>
<p>I saw one study from a mortgage broker that compared five 1-year mortgages to one 5-year mortgage since 1950. It showed that 1-year mortgages saved money 100% of the time. In other words, probably every last Canadian that every took out a 5-year fixed mortgage wasted money on interest.</p>
<p>You mentioned $2,500/year savings as though it is nothing. Multiply by 25 years that you may have mortgages in your life and you get $62,500 savings over your life &#8211; after tax. Don&#8217;t you want to save all this money?</p>
<p>You are right that rates are low today and will likely rise, but the 5-year rate is close to 2% above the 1-year rate. If rates rise by 2.5% and stay there, five 1-year mortgages still win over taking a 5-year today.</p>
<p>Today, we are recommending 1-year fixed, not variable. The best variable rates are prime -.3%, but we expect that the prime -.85% rates will be back in a year or 2, so why lock in for 5 years at a small discount?</p>
<p>We are recommending to stick with the 1-year fixed and are getting 1.99% today.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind worrying about the small chance of a huge rise in interest rates. I&#8217;ll keep the 2%/year savings and nearly 100% chance of saving thousands of dollars. :)</p>
<p>The other important factor is that, whenever your mortgage comes due, you have all kinds of opportunities &#8211; you can refinance other debt, you can restructure for investment or other strategies, or you an negotiate other goodies from the bank.</p>
<p>During your term, you have zero negotiating power with the bank, plus the odds of you having to pay a penalty sometime during your term are high. You generally cannot sell your home or refinance without paying a penalty.</p>
<p>Until recently, mortgages from every institution did not show on the Credit Bureau. Most still don&#8217;t but they are moving them all onto it.</p>
<p>This should not be a major factor, since you need to declare all your existing mortgages anyway when you apply for a new one. If you are applying for a mortgage and don&#8217;t declare existing mortgages you have because they don&#8217;t show on the Credit Bureau &#8211; that is fraud. You can get sued for that.</p>
<p>I would suggest to ignore the fear of higher rates you are being told to worry about and stick with saving money, Raj.</p>
<p>I hope you find this helpful.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110924</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110924</guid>
		<description>Another comment. 
Variable rate may not be good all the time, similar to 
Bank&#039;s readvancable mortgage. 

Reasons:
 - Rates are historical low and can not be any lower.
 - Much higher return can be obtained if one puts his mind 
    into right investment as opposed worrying about variable rates.
 - Leveraging itself is a risk, home owner does not need
     another head ache regarding mortgage payment going up.
- Maximum that can be saved in a typical average mortgage is roughly $2500 / year


All this points to firstline Matrix as number one product.
I am surprised that these positive factors totally ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another comment.<br />
Variable rate may not be good all the time, similar to<br />
Bank&#8217;s readvancable mortgage. </p>
<p>Reasons:<br />
 &#8211; Rates are historical low and can not be any lower.<br />
 &#8211; Much higher return can be obtained if one puts his mind<br />
    into right investment as opposed worrying about variable rates.<br />
 &#8211; Leveraging itself is a risk, home owner does not need<br />
     another head ache regarding mortgage payment going up.<br />
- Maximum that can be saved in a typical average mortgage is roughly $2500 / year</p>
<p>All this points to firstline Matrix as number one product.<br />
I am surprised that these positive factors totally ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110923</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110923</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

I think firstline matrix is also a good product for SM.
Here are the reasons:
a. They do not report to credit beau.
b. Hence your credit remains clean.

After 5 years let&#039;s say you have borrowed roughly 100K
then use that money and your excellent credit rating to 
buy one rental property.

Bank&#039;s care about their payment.
That&#039;s it.  Bank&#039;s leverage 10 times legally.
You can leverage too if you are smart.

Sounds like a good plan.

Why it can not be done with Banks ?
 - Banks attack your credit right away and credit rating goes
to zero and no one will lend you again.

That&#039;s my 2 cents.

Thanks,
Raj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>I think firstline matrix is also a good product for SM.<br />
Here are the reasons:<br />
a. They do not report to credit beau.<br />
b. Hence your credit remains clean.</p>
<p>After 5 years let&#8217;s say you have borrowed roughly 100K<br />
then use that money and your excellent credit rating to<br />
buy one rental property.</p>
<p>Bank&#8217;s care about their payment.<br />
That&#8217;s it.  Bank&#8217;s leverage 10 times legally.<br />
You can leverage too if you are smart.</p>
<p>Sounds like a good plan.</p>
<p>Why it can not be done with Banks ?<br />
 &#8211; Banks attack your credit right away and credit rating goes<br />
to zero and no one will lend you again.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my 2 cents.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Raj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110842</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110842</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

I am interested to avail of your recommendations. I want to know 
where do I get 10 questions so that I can send my answers to you.

I wanted to wait for 2 years because, credit line to build up.
Initially with 20% down payment, credit line is $0 anyway.

regards,
Raj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>I am interested to avail of your recommendations. I want to know<br />
where do I get 10 questions so that I can send my answers to you.</p>
<p>I wanted to wait for 2 years because, credit line to build up.<br />
Initially with 20% down payment, credit line is $0 anyway.</p>
<p>regards,<br />
Raj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110665</guid>
		<description>Hi Raj,

You can do both. Normally, you can get exactly the same rates in a readvanceable that you get in an ordinary mortgage. So, your best bet is to get a readvanceable mortgage now, so that you have it ready whenever you are ready to invest?

Having one readvanceable is much more flexible than having a mortgage with a 2nd credit line from a different bank.

You can only get a readvanceable mortgage up to 80% of your home value. Above that, you need CMHC, which can be large fees. None of the readvanceable mortgage are available above 80% any longer.

The SM is an aggressive strategy, since it is borrowing to invest. You need to have the right type of temperament to be successful. Investments will go down sometimes, but the markets have always gone up and made good returns long term. You need to be the type of person that can remain confident and stay invested (or even add more) through the inevitable downturns.

The SM is a great way to build wealth and save for your retirement without using your cash flow, but it is not for everybody.

We are recommending 1-year rates today. Studies show that 1-year and variable rates nearly always save money over 5-year fixed mortgages. By going with 1-year or variable only, we have been between 3.5-5% nearly all of the last 15 years. Today&#039;s 5-year rate of 3.59% is slightly below the average rate of the last 15 years, but not much of a savings.

The best rate we are getting is 1.99% today on a 1-year with prime+.5% (2.75%) on the credit line. This is a great opportunity to have a really low rate for at least a year.

We are still offering Ed&#039;s Mortgage Referral Service. If you send us answers to the 10 questions, we will be able to recommend the mortgage that suits you best and refer you to our contact. There is no charge for this service.

Why are you waiting 2 years to start, Raj?



Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Raj,</p>
<p>You can do both. Normally, you can get exactly the same rates in a readvanceable that you get in an ordinary mortgage. So, your best bet is to get a readvanceable mortgage now, so that you have it ready whenever you are ready to invest?</p>
<p>Having one readvanceable is much more flexible than having a mortgage with a 2nd credit line from a different bank.</p>
<p>You can only get a readvanceable mortgage up to 80% of your home value. Above that, you need CMHC, which can be large fees. None of the readvanceable mortgage are available above 80% any longer.</p>
<p>The SM is an aggressive strategy, since it is borrowing to invest. You need to have the right type of temperament to be successful. Investments will go down sometimes, but the markets have always gone up and made good returns long term. You need to be the type of person that can remain confident and stay invested (or even add more) through the inevitable downturns.</p>
<p>The SM is a great way to build wealth and save for your retirement without using your cash flow, but it is not for everybody.</p>
<p>We are recommending 1-year rates today. Studies show that 1-year and variable rates nearly always save money over 5-year fixed mortgages. By going with 1-year or variable only, we have been between 3.5-5% nearly all of the last 15 years. Today&#8217;s 5-year rate of 3.59% is slightly below the average rate of the last 15 years, but not much of a savings.</p>
<p>The best rate we are getting is 1.99% today on a 1-year with prime+.5% (2.75%) on the credit line. This is a great opportunity to have a really low rate for at least a year.</p>
<p>We are still offering Ed&#8217;s Mortgage Referral Service. If you send us answers to the 10 questions, we will be able to recommend the mortgage that suits you best and refer you to our contact. There is no charge for this service.</p>
<p>Why are you waiting 2 years to start, Raj?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110664</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110664</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

Capitalization is usually a manual transaction. The bank won&#039;t automatically compound it. They will want to take the payment from your chequing account. Then all you do is take exactly the same amount out of the credit line to repay your chequing account.

If you take exactly the same amount (to the penny) shortly after they charge you, then tracking for CRA is relatively easy.

With Royal, you might want to open up a separate chequing account just for the SM. Royal does not allow investing directly from the credit line, so you need to transfer from the credit line to a chequing account in order to invest. Once you have a separate chequing account, you can just have all your interest payments come out of that same account. That way, you just transfer enough into the SM chequing to avoid anything bouncing, but you don&#039;t need to worry about capitalizing the exact amount.

Does that make sense?

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>Capitalization is usually a manual transaction. The bank won&#8217;t automatically compound it. They will want to take the payment from your chequing account. Then all you do is take exactly the same amount out of the credit line to repay your chequing account.</p>
<p>If you take exactly the same amount (to the penny) shortly after they charge you, then tracking for CRA is relatively easy.</p>
<p>With Royal, you might want to open up a separate chequing account just for the SM. Royal does not allow investing directly from the credit line, so you need to transfer from the credit line to a chequing account in order to invest. Once you have a separate chequing account, you can just have all your interest payments come out of that same account. That way, you just transfer enough into the SM chequing to avoid anything bouncing, but you don&#8217;t need to worry about capitalizing the exact amount.</p>
<p>Does that make sense?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110662</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110662</guid>
		<description>Raj, best thing is to contact a mortgage broker and get quotes on &quot;readvanceable mortgages&quot;.  That way, you can get an accurate picture of what&#039;s available and at what price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj, best thing is to contact a mortgage broker and get quotes on &#8220;readvanceable mortgages&#8221;.  That way, you can get an accurate picture of what&#8217;s available and at what price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110661</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110661</guid>
		<description>Can I get readvancement upto 80% or 95% of the property value ?

Another question is   will one Bank offer me both of the following as of today&#039;s rates:
 1. Fixed rate of  3.7 % (comaprable)  for 5 years closed  
 2. revolving readvancable rate of 2.8% (comparable)

I want to know more on BMO scheme &quot;when you said I can do both&quot;
How ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get readvancement upto 80% or 95% of the property value ?</p>
<p>Another question is   will one Bank offer me both of the following as of today&#8217;s rates:<br />
 1. Fixed rate of  3.7 % (comaprable)  for 5 years closed<br />
 2. revolving readvancable rate of 2.8% (comparable)</p>
<p>I want to know more on BMO scheme &#8220;when you said I can do both&#8221;<br />
How ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110660</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110660</guid>
		<description>Yes, you can get a HELOC for $50k on your property, but it won&#039;t be readvanceable from another bank.  That is, you want the credit limit of your HELOC to increase automatically as you pay down your principal.  Otherwise, you&#039;d have to reapply to get your credit limit increased which may face legal fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can get a HELOC for $50k on your property, but it won&#8217;t be readvanceable from another bank.  That is, you want the credit limit of your HELOC to increase automatically as you pay down your principal.  Otherwise, you&#8217;d have to reapply to get your credit limit increased which may face legal fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110659</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110659</guid>
		<description>FrugalTrader,

Lets us say  my home is worth  260K
80% of that is  roughly             200K
I owe one Bank 150K on first mortgage.

Is it possible to borrow 50K from another Bank at competing rate
as a second lien on the property ?
Why I have to go with one Bank only mortgage and readvancing of equity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FrugalTrader,</p>
<p>Lets us say  my home is worth  260K<br />
80% of that is  roughly             200K<br />
I owe one Bank 150K on first mortgage.</p>
<p>Is it possible to borrow 50K from another Bank at competing rate<br />
as a second lien on the property ?<br />
Why I have to go with one Bank only mortgage and readvancing of equity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110658</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110658</guid>
		<description>Raj, the SM is a leveraged investment strategy.  If investments go down, they go down.  My SM portfolio went down almost 30% during the market correction of 2008.  Question is, can you stick with the plan even during rough times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj, the SM is a leveraged investment strategy.  If investments go down, they go down.  My SM portfolio went down almost 30% during the market correction of 2008.  Question is, can you stick with the plan even during rough times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110657</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110657</guid>
		<description>Does RBC have similar product ?
Can you refer me to the BMO  person ?

Here is my situation. I get low fixed rate of 3.59% for 5 years.
I can get HELOC of 2.8 something %  variable.
Reference: valueland.ca

What if I go for 3.59% fixed now with 20% down and 
then after 2 years tap into Credit line for reinvesting ?

Another interesting question: What happens to your investments in a down market ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does RBC have similar product ?<br />
Can you refer me to the BMO  person ?</p>
<p>Here is my situation. I get low fixed rate of 3.59% for 5 years.<br />
I can get HELOC of 2.8 something %  variable.<br />
Reference: valueland.ca</p>
<p>What if I go for 3.59% fixed now with 20% down and<br />
then after 2 years tap into Credit line for reinvesting ?</p>
<p>Another interesting question: What happens to your investments in a down market ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110656</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110656</guid>
		<description>Raj, you can do both.  A readvanceable mortgage can be a low fixed rate mortgage with a HELOC attached that increases its credit.  I got mine with BMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj, you can do both.  A readvanceable mortgage can be a low fixed rate mortgage with a HELOC attached that increases its credit.  I got mine with BMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-110655</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-110655</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed,

I have 20% down for a 260K mortgage. 
I have a dialemma as to go for  readvancable mortgage
or go for low fixed rate mortgage and then after few years
tap into home equity to invest.

what is your suggestion ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>I have 20% down for a 260K mortgage.<br />
I have a dialemma as to go for  readvancable mortgage<br />
or go for low fixed rate mortgage and then after few years<br />
tap into home equity to invest.</p>
<p>what is your suggestion ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage I &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-25844</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage I &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-25844</guid>
		<description>[...] In part 2, we&#039;ll look at the criteria when evaluating a mortgage for The Smith Manoeuvre. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] In part 2, we&#39;ll look at the criteria when evaluating a mortgage for The Smith Manoeuvre. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24505</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24505</guid>
		<description>hi ed,
yes, your last paragraph made it clear- so you DO borrow from the credit line to pay the interest, effectively leaving less  of a credit availability to invest- but still, enough of a good portion to make the SM worth it.
so out of a $500 monthly example- you only pay about $2.40 from the credit line to cover the interest- the other $497.60 is invested...right? now, is this capitalization a manual effort on my part to cover the interest owed? or would a bank allow any interest payment owed to be automatically drawn again from the credit line??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ed,<br />
yes, your last paragraph made it clear- so you DO borrow from the credit line to pay the interest, effectively leaving less  of a credit availability to invest- but still, enough of a good portion to make the SM worth it.<br />
so out of a $500 monthly example- you only pay about $2.40 from the credit line to cover the interest- the other $497.60 is invested&#8230;right? now, is this capitalization a manual effort on my part to cover the interest owed? or would a bank allow any interest payment owed to be automatically drawn again from the credit line??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24406</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24406</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

Where is everyone getting the idea that the SM involves the investments paying the loan interest? That would be just ordinary leverage.

Once you get the right mortgage, this will be clearer. Royal is one bank that will convert your existing 1st mortgage and your credit line into a Homeline. Within the Homeline, they will let you keep your great mortgage rate and existing mortgage due date, and it will now be in one mortgage product combined with your investment credit line.

Then, as you make each ordinary mortgage payment, you automatically gain more credit available in the credit line. You can use this additional credit to both pay the interest on your existing tax deductible balance and then you can invest the remainder.

In the future if you move your mortgage, then move the entire readvanceable mortgage (mortgage and credit line) to your new bank.

If your Royal mortgage person won&#039;t do this conversion, then we can refer you to our contact at Royal.

The SM is about borrowing back the additional principal gained by each mortgage payment. It may or may not involve a lump sum.

The investments don&#039;t need to pay out a penny of income. The large long term benefit comes when you can leave your investments to compound over many years.

The key to doing the SM without using any of your cash flow is capitalizing the interest. For example, if your bi-weekly mortgage payment of $1,000 includes $500 of principal, then you gain $500 available credit in your credit line automatically. If the interest on your existing investment credit line is $200, then borrow $200 to pay this interest. That leaves you $300 that you can invest every 2 weeks.

Does that make it clearer, Alex?




Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>Where is everyone getting the idea that the SM involves the investments paying the loan interest? That would be just ordinary leverage.</p>
<p>Once you get the right mortgage, this will be clearer. Royal is one bank that will convert your existing 1st mortgage and your credit line into a Homeline. Within the Homeline, they will let you keep your great mortgage rate and existing mortgage due date, and it will now be in one mortgage product combined with your investment credit line.</p>
<p>Then, as you make each ordinary mortgage payment, you automatically gain more credit available in the credit line. You can use this additional credit to both pay the interest on your existing tax deductible balance and then you can invest the remainder.</p>
<p>In the future if you move your mortgage, then move the entire readvanceable mortgage (mortgage and credit line) to your new bank.</p>
<p>If your Royal mortgage person won&#8217;t do this conversion, then we can refer you to our contact at Royal.</p>
<p>The SM is about borrowing back the additional principal gained by each mortgage payment. It may or may not involve a lump sum.</p>
<p>The investments don&#8217;t need to pay out a penny of income. The large long term benefit comes when you can leave your investments to compound over many years.</p>
<p>The key to doing the SM without using any of your cash flow is capitalizing the interest. For example, if your bi-weekly mortgage payment of $1,000 includes $500 of principal, then you gain $500 available credit in your credit line automatically. If the interest on your existing investment credit line is $200, then borrow $200 to pay this interest. That leaves you $300 that you can invest every 2 weeks.</p>
<p>Does that make it clearer, Alex?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24399</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24399</guid>
		<description>ed,
what i meant is that, upon renewal, royal may offer, say, based on todays rates, 5.99% on another 5 yr fixed mtg- but, if i can get, say, 5.79% at scotia- i would obviously switch &amp; take the better deal, right? 
problem is- if i switched my 1st mortgage out of royal (on maturity)- i don&#039;t think they&#039;d allow me to keep the &#039;homeline&#039; product with them, being in 2nd position behind another financial institution. they&#039;d want to be the lender in 1st position also. so i&#039;d have to break royal&#039;s homeline &amp; obtain something similar, or a readvanceable mortgage, with another lender- incurring legals, etc because it would not be deemed as a straight switch/transfer- but a refinance. does that make sense? 

on your 1st point, i think all i&#039;d have to do is change my secured credit line to a homeline (in royal&#039;s case) which is basically what u suggest. i don&#039;t think it has anything to do with the actual 1st mortgage...does it??

ed, i&#039;m still a bit unclear as to how SM works with &#039;no money out of your pocket&#039;?? if i&#039;m borrowing from the credit line- i have to pay that interest owed monthly (eg. $500 per month) but if my investments are not producing enough of a dividend- (or i choose to reinvest into a DRIP) &amp; my tax refund is not coming for a whole year- where is this money coming from??? do you draw funds from your credit line &amp; transfer to your bank account to be debited for what you owe? also, if i&#039;m on a straight commission or self-employed- i&#039;d basically just be reducing my taxable income- not receiving any refund- how does SM affect me specifically???

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed,<br />
what i meant is that, upon renewal, royal may offer, say, based on todays rates, 5.99% on another 5 yr fixed mtg- but, if i can get, say, 5.79% at scotia- i would obviously switch &amp; take the better deal, right?<br />
problem is- if i switched my 1st mortgage out of royal (on maturity)- i don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d allow me to keep the &#8216;homeline&#8217; product with them, being in 2nd position behind another financial institution. they&#8217;d want to be the lender in 1st position also. so i&#8217;d have to break royal&#8217;s homeline &amp; obtain something similar, or a readvanceable mortgage, with another lender- incurring legals, etc because it would not be deemed as a straight switch/transfer- but a refinance. does that make sense? </p>
<p>on your 1st point, i think all i&#8217;d have to do is change my secured credit line to a homeline (in royal&#8217;s case) which is basically what u suggest. i don&#8217;t think it has anything to do with the actual 1st mortgage&#8230;does it??</p>
<p>ed, i&#8217;m still a bit unclear as to how SM works with &#8216;no money out of your pocket&#8217;?? if i&#8217;m borrowing from the credit line- i have to pay that interest owed monthly (eg. $500 per month) but if my investments are not producing enough of a dividend- (or i choose to reinvest into a DRIP) &amp; my tax refund is not coming for a whole year- where is this money coming from??? do you draw funds from your credit line &amp; transfer to your bank account to be debited for what you owe? also, if i&#8217;m on a straight commission or self-employed- i&#8217;d basically just be reducing my taxable income- not receiving any refund- how does SM affect me specifically???</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24362</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24362</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

I may have some good news for you. Royal is one of the banks that will convert a mortgage and credit line into a Homeline plan and allow you to keep your great rate and the same maturity date.

You will probably have to pay legal and appraisal fees in this case, but you can convert to a readvanceable mortgage and do the SM more fully.

I don&#039;t quite understand your other point, but when the mortgage comes due, you can move the mortgage and credit line together to wherever you want.




Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>I may have some good news for you. Royal is one of the banks that will convert a mortgage and credit line into a Homeline plan and allow you to keep your great rate and the same maturity date.</p>
<p>You will probably have to pay legal and appraisal fees in this case, but you can convert to a readvanceable mortgage and do the SM more fully.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand your other point, but when the mortgage comes due, you can move the mortgage and credit line together to wherever you want.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
