<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm</link>
	<description>Building Wealth through Saving and Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:00:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage I &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-25844</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage I &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-25844</guid>
		<description>[...] In part 2, we&#039;ll look at the criteria when evaluating a mortgage for The Smith Manoeuvre. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] In part 2, we&#39;ll look at the criteria when evaluating a mortgage for The Smith Manoeuvre. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24505</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24505</guid>
		<description>hi ed,
yes, your last paragraph made it clear- so you DO borrow from the credit line to pay the interest, effectively leaving less  of a credit availability to invest- but still, enough of a good portion to make the SM worth it.
so out of a $500 monthly example- you only pay about $2.40 from the credit line to cover the interest- the other $497.60 is invested...right? now, is this capitalization a manual effort on my part to cover the interest owed? or would a bank allow any interest payment owed to be automatically drawn again from the credit line??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ed,<br />
yes, your last paragraph made it clear- so you DO borrow from the credit line to pay the interest, effectively leaving less  of a credit availability to invest- but still, enough of a good portion to make the SM worth it.<br />
so out of a $500 monthly example- you only pay about $2.40 from the credit line to cover the interest- the other $497.60 is invested&#8230;right? now, is this capitalization a manual effort on my part to cover the interest owed? or would a bank allow any interest payment owed to be automatically drawn again from the credit line??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24406</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24406</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

Where is everyone getting the idea that the SM involves the investments paying the loan interest? That would be just ordinary leverage.

Once you get the right mortgage, this will be clearer. Royal is one bank that will convert your existing 1st mortgage and your credit line into a Homeline. Within the Homeline, they will let you keep your great mortgage rate and existing mortgage due date, and it will now be in one mortgage product combined with your investment credit line.

Then, as you make each ordinary mortgage payment, you automatically gain more credit available in the credit line. You can use this additional credit to both pay the interest on your existing tax deductible balance and then you can invest the remainder.

In the future if you move your mortgage, then move the entire readvanceable mortgage (mortgage and credit line) to your new bank.

If your Royal mortgage person won&#039;t do this conversion, then we can refer you to our contact at Royal.

The SM is about borrowing back the additional principal gained by each mortgage payment. It may or may not involve a lump sum.

The investments don&#039;t need to pay out a penny of income. The large long term benefit comes when you can leave your investments to compound over many years.

The key to doing the SM without using any of your cash flow is capitalizing the interest. For example, if your bi-weekly mortgage payment of $1,000 includes $500 of principal, then you gain $500 available credit in your credit line automatically. If the interest on your existing investment credit line is $200, then borrow $200 to pay this interest. That leaves you $300 that you can invest every 2 weeks.

Does that make it clearer, Alex?




Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>Where is everyone getting the idea that the SM involves the investments paying the loan interest? That would be just ordinary leverage.</p>
<p>Once you get the right mortgage, this will be clearer. Royal is one bank that will convert your existing 1st mortgage and your credit line into a Homeline. Within the Homeline, they will let you keep your great mortgage rate and existing mortgage due date, and it will now be in one mortgage product combined with your investment credit line.</p>
<p>Then, as you make each ordinary mortgage payment, you automatically gain more credit available in the credit line. You can use this additional credit to both pay the interest on your existing tax deductible balance and then you can invest the remainder.</p>
<p>In the future if you move your mortgage, then move the entire readvanceable mortgage (mortgage and credit line) to your new bank.</p>
<p>If your Royal mortgage person won&#8217;t do this conversion, then we can refer you to our contact at Royal.</p>
<p>The SM is about borrowing back the additional principal gained by each mortgage payment. It may or may not involve a lump sum.</p>
<p>The investments don&#8217;t need to pay out a penny of income. The large long term benefit comes when you can leave your investments to compound over many years.</p>
<p>The key to doing the SM without using any of your cash flow is capitalizing the interest. For example, if your bi-weekly mortgage payment of $1,000 includes $500 of principal, then you gain $500 available credit in your credit line automatically. If the interest on your existing investment credit line is $200, then borrow $200 to pay this interest. That leaves you $300 that you can invest every 2 weeks.</p>
<p>Does that make it clearer, Alex?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24399</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24399</guid>
		<description>ed,
what i meant is that, upon renewal, royal may offer, say, based on todays rates, 5.99% on another 5 yr fixed mtg- but, if i can get, say, 5.79% at scotia- i would obviously switch &amp; take the better deal, right? 
problem is- if i switched my 1st mortgage out of royal (on maturity)- i don&#039;t think they&#039;d allow me to keep the &#039;homeline&#039; product with them, being in 2nd position behind another financial institution. they&#039;d want to be the lender in 1st position also. so i&#039;d have to break royal&#039;s homeline &amp; obtain something similar, or a readvanceable mortgage, with another lender- incurring legals, etc because it would not be deemed as a straight switch/transfer- but a refinance. does that make sense? 

on your 1st point, i think all i&#039;d have to do is change my secured credit line to a homeline (in royal&#039;s case) which is basically what u suggest. i don&#039;t think it has anything to do with the actual 1st mortgage...does it??

ed, i&#039;m still a bit unclear as to how SM works with &#039;no money out of your pocket&#039;?? if i&#039;m borrowing from the credit line- i have to pay that interest owed monthly (eg. $500 per month) but if my investments are not producing enough of a dividend- (or i choose to reinvest into a DRIP) &amp; my tax refund is not coming for a whole year- where is this money coming from??? do you draw funds from your credit line &amp; transfer to your bank account to be debited for what you owe? also, if i&#039;m on a straight commission or self-employed- i&#039;d basically just be reducing my taxable income- not receiving any refund- how does SM affect me specifically???

thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed,<br />
what i meant is that, upon renewal, royal may offer, say, based on todays rates, 5.99% on another 5 yr fixed mtg- but, if i can get, say, 5.79% at scotia- i would obviously switch &amp; take the better deal, right?<br />
problem is- if i switched my 1st mortgage out of royal (on maturity)- i don&#8217;t think they&#8217;d allow me to keep the &#8216;homeline&#8217; product with them, being in 2nd position behind another financial institution. they&#8217;d want to be the lender in 1st position also. so i&#8217;d have to break royal&#8217;s homeline &amp; obtain something similar, or a readvanceable mortgage, with another lender- incurring legals, etc because it would not be deemed as a straight switch/transfer- but a refinance. does that make sense? </p>
<p>on your 1st point, i think all i&#8217;d have to do is change my secured credit line to a homeline (in royal&#8217;s case) which is basically what u suggest. i don&#8217;t think it has anything to do with the actual 1st mortgage&#8230;does it??</p>
<p>ed, i&#8217;m still a bit unclear as to how SM works with &#8216;no money out of your pocket&#8217;?? if i&#8217;m borrowing from the credit line- i have to pay that interest owed monthly (eg. $500 per month) but if my investments are not producing enough of a dividend- (or i choose to reinvest into a DRIP) &amp; my tax refund is not coming for a whole year- where is this money coming from??? do you draw funds from your credit line &amp; transfer to your bank account to be debited for what you owe? also, if i&#8217;m on a straight commission or self-employed- i&#8217;d basically just be reducing my taxable income- not receiving any refund- how does SM affect me specifically???</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24362</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-24362</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex,

I may have some good news for you. Royal is one of the banks that will convert a mortgage and credit line into a Homeline plan and allow you to keep your great rate and the same maturity date.

You will probably have to pay legal and appraisal fees in this case, but you can convert to a readvanceable mortgage and do the SM more fully.

I don&#039;t quite understand your other point, but when the mortgage comes due, you can move the mortgage and credit line together to wherever you want.




Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex,</p>
<p>I may have some good news for you. Royal is one of the banks that will convert a mortgage and credit line into a Homeline plan and allow you to keep your great rate and the same maturity date.</p>
<p>You will probably have to pay legal and appraisal fees in this case, but you can convert to a readvanceable mortgage and do the SM more fully.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand your other point, but when the mortgage comes due, you can move the mortgage and credit line together to wherever you want.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomw</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23646</link>
		<dc:creator>tomw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-23646</guid>
		<description>thank-you
that makes sense now
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank-you<br />
that makes sense now<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrugalTrader</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23593</link>
		<dc:creator>FrugalTrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-23593</guid>
		<description>Tomw, it&#039;s called the superficial loss rule.  You can read more about it here:
http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/how-investing-taxes-work-part-1.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomw, it&#8217;s called the superficial loss rule.  You can read more about it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/how-investing-taxes-work-part-1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/how-investing-taxes-work-part-1.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomw</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23592</link>
		<dc:creator>tomw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-23592</guid>
		<description>What is the:
&quot;30 day rule about selling/buying securities for tax reasons.&quot;

I can only find a reference online in a web search to the Wash Out Rule in the US specific to the IRS.

What Canadian tax rule specifies 30 days?

Thanks to all the contributors this is a VERY informative thread, (i.e. Don&#039;t cross or revenue and borrowing streams!)

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the:<br />
&#8220;30 day rule about selling/buying securities for tax reasons.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can only find a reference online in a web search to the Wash Out Rule in the US specific to the IRS.</p>
<p>What Canadian tax rule specifies 30 days?</p>
<p>Thanks to all the contributors this is a VERY informative thread, (i.e. Don&#8217;t cross or revenue and borrowing streams!)</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23519</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-23519</guid>
		<description>ed,
i currently have a non-deductible mortgage with RBC (in the 4.50% range) and a secured credit line at prime (now 5.75%) with RBC as well. so they are, in fact, separate. the reason i opted against the &#039;homeline&#039; option at RBC- which grows as i pay my 1st mtg down- is that i&#039;d have the ability to switch my 1st mtg to another lender if a better deal came along on renewal- instead of getting stuck with a potentially higher rate, in exchange for the luxury of the automatic credit line increase. since there are only a few stock purchases on the credit line- i&#039;d hope it would be easy to claim.

mike,
i don&#039;t believe i have any non- deductible purchases on my credit line? it is currently used somewhat infrequently.
but i can see, if used more often, how confusing it can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed,<br />
i currently have a non-deductible mortgage with RBC (in the 4.50% range) and a secured credit line at prime (now 5.75%) with RBC as well. so they are, in fact, separate. the reason i opted against the &#8216;homeline&#8217; option at RBC- which grows as i pay my 1st mtg down- is that i&#8217;d have the ability to switch my 1st mtg to another lender if a better deal came along on renewal- instead of getting stuck with a potentially higher rate, in exchange for the luxury of the automatic credit line increase. since there are only a few stock purchases on the credit line- i&#8217;d hope it would be easy to claim.</p>
<p>mike,<br />
i don&#8217;t believe i have any non- deductible purchases on my credit line? it is currently used somewhat infrequently.<br />
but i can see, if used more often, how confusing it can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23049</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-23049</guid>
		<description>Alex - you shouldn&#039;t commingle your deductible accounts with non-deductible.  I had a similar situation with my leveraged plan where due to a bank error, things got commingled.  I talked to the CRA and they were pretty clear that for deductible borrowing there has to be a &quot;clear path&quot; from the loan to the investment and they said I had to clear up my commingling - this was done by selling the equities - paying off the commingled loan and then reborrowing and rebuying securities.  Keep in mind the 30 day rule about selling/buying securities for tax reasons.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; you shouldn&#8217;t commingle your deductible accounts with non-deductible.  I had a similar situation with my leveraged plan where due to a bank error, things got commingled.  I talked to the CRA and they were pretty clear that for deductible borrowing there has to be a &#8220;clear path&#8221; from the loan to the investment and they said I had to clear up my commingling &#8211; this was done by selling the equities &#8211; paying off the commingled loan and then reborrowing and rebuying securities.  Keep in mind the 30 day rule about selling/buying securities for tax reasons.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-23019</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-23019</guid>
		<description>Alex,

Interesting question. The answer is - maybe, at best. Assuming you can track it exactly and prove it, you should be fine, but that will be much harder than you think.

You may be able to track the original purchase, but what happens with all future transactions? When you pay down the credit line, did you pay down the deductible or non-deductible part? CRA might take a different position and claim that all payments were applied to the deductible part.

With the SM, you end up with many transactions, including purchases every few weeks, perhaps of multiple investments. If you capitalize the interest, that is another bunch of transactions, and it takes detailed tracking to trace how much interest capitalization was the deductible vs non-deductible interest.

It is possible to do, but having a separate credit line is much better and safer. That also allows you to capitalize the interest properly.

If you have them together, you should try to separate them if possible at your bank. Is there a problem separating them? Where is your mortgage and credit line, Alex?





Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>Interesting question. The answer is &#8211; maybe, at best. Assuming you can track it exactly and prove it, you should be fine, but that will be much harder than you think.</p>
<p>You may be able to track the original purchase, but what happens with all future transactions? When you pay down the credit line, did you pay down the deductible or non-deductible part? CRA might take a different position and claim that all payments were applied to the deductible part.</p>
<p>With the SM, you end up with many transactions, including purchases every few weeks, perhaps of multiple investments. If you capitalize the interest, that is another bunch of transactions, and it takes detailed tracking to trace how much interest capitalization was the deductible vs non-deductible interest.</p>
<p>It is possible to do, but having a separate credit line is much better and safer. That also allows you to capitalize the interest properly.</p>
<p>If you have them together, you should try to separate them if possible at your bank. Is there a problem separating them? Where is your mortgage and credit line, Alex?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-22112</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-22112</guid>
		<description>ed, 
i&#039;m curious- if you have a secured credit line against your home and you use that for the SM, in addition to some other purchases- as long as you can correlate the specific investment purchase to specific investment statements of the same amount and same date- does that allow/qualify for tax deductability and use of the SM?? or do you require an actual &#039;sub-account&#039; used to distinguish a pattern of investment??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ed,<br />
i&#8217;m curious- if you have a secured credit line against your home and you use that for the SM, in addition to some other purchases- as long as you can correlate the specific investment purchase to specific investment statements of the same amount and same date- does that allow/qualify for tax deductability and use of the SM?? or do you require an actual &#8217;sub-account&#8217; used to distinguish a pattern of investment??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike-TWA</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-15940</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike-TWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-15940</guid>
		<description>These are some great suggestions. Thank you very much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are some great suggestions. Thank you very much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: best mortgage &#187; Ed Rempel’s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage II</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-15872</link>
		<dc:creator>best mortgage &#187; Ed Rempel’s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-15872</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptFT has been asking us how we can help his readers figure out which mortgage is really the best mortgage in your situation. Since the answer can be somewhat complex, we are offering “Ed’s Mortgage Referral Service” only to Million Dollar &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptFT has been asking us how we can help his readers figure out which mortgage is really the best mortgage in your situation. Since the answer can be somewhat complex, we are offering “Ed’s Mortgage Referral Service” only to Million Dollar &#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-15175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-15175</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

There were quite a few posts about the new Canadian Tire All-In-One. We checked it out and it does NOT work for the SM.

It is only launched as a trial in 3 cities so far and is almost exactly like Manulife ONE. It is a complete chequing account and also a mortgage and the rates are .05% better than Manulife ONE across the board. And it does not have the $14 fee.

However, the one problem is that it does not allow sub-accounts - it is just one big account. Therefore, there is no way to keep the tax-deductible interest separate from the main non-deductible mortgage.

Perhaps they will improve it once the trial is over, but so far it will not work for the SM.


Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>There were quite a few posts about the new Canadian Tire All-In-One. We checked it out and it does NOT work for the SM.</p>
<p>It is only launched as a trial in 3 cities so far and is almost exactly like Manulife ONE. It is a complete chequing account and also a mortgage and the rates are .05% better than Manulife ONE across the board. And it does not have the $14 fee.</p>
<p>However, the one problem is that it does not allow sub-accounts &#8211; it is just one big account. Therefore, there is no way to keep the tax-deductible interest separate from the main non-deductible mortgage.</p>
<p>Perhaps they will improve it once the trial is over, but so far it will not work for the SM.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage III &#124; Million Dollar Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-14980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel&#8217;s Picks for The Best Smith Manoeuvre Mortgage III &#124; Million Dollar Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-14980</guid>
		<description>[...] This is part 3 of a 3 part series. In case you missed the other articles, here is part 1 and part 2.&#160; This final article of the series will help you decide whether or not to cancel your existing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="border: solid #DDD; padding: 0.5em;">
<p>[...] This is part 3 of a 3 part series. In case you missed the other articles, here is part 1 and part 2.&nbsp; This final article of the series will help you decide whether or not to cancel your existing [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financial Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-14727</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financial Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-14727</guid>
		<description>Hey Ed,

in fact, it is a taxable benefit starting when it is lower than the prescribed rate. For year or so, it was not taxable (the prescribed rate was 3% something). Since last year, the rate went up to 5%, which means that I&#039;m only taxed on .75%. In the end, I still get 1.7% off prime :-D

The monhtly withdrawal is automatic. I provided a void cheque for the first time and everything is automatic since then. In fact, the all-in-one could be used as a regular account, I don&#039;t know why they told you the opposite at the bank.. strange :-S!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed,</p>
<p>in fact, it is a taxable benefit starting when it is lower than the prescribed rate. For year or so, it was not taxable (the prescribed rate was 3% something). Since last year, the rate went up to 5%, which means that I&#8217;m only taxed on .75%. In the end, I still get 1.7% off prime :-D</p>
<p>The monhtly withdrawal is automatic. I provided a void cheque for the first time and everything is automatic since then. In fact, the all-in-one could be used as a regular account, I don&#8217;t know why they told you the opposite at the bank.. strange :-S!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-14726</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-14726</guid>
		<description>Hi FB,

I see why you like it. The 2% subsidy is a taxable benefit, though. So if you are in a 40% tax bracket, you only get a 1.2% effective reduction from prime. That is still a great rate though. Can you get it for anyone else???

Is the monthly withdrawal automatic, or do you have to do it your self (on-line or with a cheque)?


Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi FB,</p>
<p>I see why you like it. The 2% subsidy is a taxable benefit, though. So if you are in a 40% tax bracket, you only get a 1.2% effective reduction from prime. That is still a great rate though. Can you get it for anyone else???</p>
<p>Is the monthly withdrawal automatic, or do you have to do it your self (on-line or with a cheque)?</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Financial Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-14667</link>
		<dc:creator>The Financial Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-14667</guid>
		<description>ED,
Don&#039;t worry about my bubble, it can not be burst ;-) The main reason being as I work for them, I benefit from a reduction of 2% on my mortgage. Therefore, I pay a variable P-2% (4.25%) right now. Unfortunately, I can not combine my HELOC with a regular mortgage with National Bank, it is not offered yet. As I can find any better mortgage rate elsewhere, I am still better off with the all-in-one.

In regards to invest directly from one sub-account, I do have monthly withdrawal that take money from one sub-account and deposit it into my brokerage account. I hope this is what you mean by &quot;Allows investing directly from the credit line.&quot;. If not, I don&#039;t know what you are referring too. Can you confirm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ED,<br />
Don&#8217;t worry about my bubble, it can not be burst ;-) The main reason being as I work for them, I benefit from a reduction of 2% on my mortgage. Therefore, I pay a variable P-2% (4.25%) right now. Unfortunately, I can not combine my HELOC with a regular mortgage with National Bank, it is not offered yet. As I can find any better mortgage rate elsewhere, I am still better off with the all-in-one.</p>
<p>In regards to invest directly from one sub-account, I do have monthly withdrawal that take money from one sub-account and deposit it into my brokerage account. I hope this is what you mean by &#8220;Allows investing directly from the credit line.&#8221;. If not, I don&#8217;t know what you are referring too. Can you confirm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rempel</title>
		<link>http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm/comment-page-1#comment-14665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rempel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.milliondollarjourney.com/ed-rempels-picks-for-the-best-smith-manoeuvre-mortgage-ii.htm#comment-14665</guid>
		<description>Hi Day Late,

You&#039;re in Manitoba? I&#039;m originally from Manitoba, as well - Winnipeg.

The odd case where Manulife One may work is where there is little or no mortgage, where the client is very accurate and tends to carry high chequing and savings account balances.

If there is little or no mortgage (like mine) then the SM is entirely in a credit line at prime, just like anywhere else. It is the fixed mortgage rates (and lack of a variable below prime) where Manulife One tends to not be competitive with the fully discounted rates at other banks.

I forgot to mention in my fee disclosure in the articles that financial advisors would get paid a finder&#039;s fee from Manulife. Financial advisors often recommend it for that reason, but we have not recommended it for any clients (although I have one myself).

M1 advances automatically, but requires that the client is very careful in tracking all their tax-decutible transactions. You can only invest automatically from the main account (which is your main mortgage at prime), but then need to make manual transfers to a sub-account used for the SM. The interest can also be compounded manually. Investing additional amounts (like Daniel in the last blog) will also mean you have to do a manual transfer from the sub-account.

It works, but can easily be messed up by the client, so only a very accurate person should use M1 for the SM.

There is also the $14/month fee. There is usually some saving, because you essentially get daily interest on your chequing account. This is a plus for those that normally carry high chequing &amp; saving account balances. You generally should have average balances in your chequing and savings accounts of at least $4-5,000 in order for this interest savings to cover the $14/month fee.



Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Day Late,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re in Manitoba? I&#8217;m originally from Manitoba, as well &#8211; Winnipeg.</p>
<p>The odd case where Manulife One may work is where there is little or no mortgage, where the client is very accurate and tends to carry high chequing and savings account balances.</p>
<p>If there is little or no mortgage (like mine) then the SM is entirely in a credit line at prime, just like anywhere else. It is the fixed mortgage rates (and lack of a variable below prime) where Manulife One tends to not be competitive with the fully discounted rates at other banks.</p>
<p>I forgot to mention in my fee disclosure in the articles that financial advisors would get paid a finder&#8217;s fee from Manulife. Financial advisors often recommend it for that reason, but we have not recommended it for any clients (although I have one myself).</p>
<p>M1 advances automatically, but requires that the client is very careful in tracking all their tax-decutible transactions. You can only invest automatically from the main account (which is your main mortgage at prime), but then need to make manual transfers to a sub-account used for the SM. The interest can also be compounded manually. Investing additional amounts (like Daniel in the last blog) will also mean you have to do a manual transfer from the sub-account.</p>
<p>It works, but can easily be messed up by the client, so only a very accurate person should use M1 for the SM.</p>
<p>There is also the $14/month fee. There is usually some saving, because you essentially get daily interest on your chequing account. This is a plus for those that normally carry high chequing &amp; saving account balances. You generally should have average balances in your chequing and savings accounts of at least $4-5,000 in order for this interest savings to cover the $14/month fee.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
